May 15th, 2020 | The Nosedive. How To Research The Job Market?

The nosedive, job market research

This text was fully written by a human.

For my whole youth, I was spending most of my time reading books and going through thousands of textbook assignments. In the end, after twenty years of torturing myself with books, articles, and never-ending assignments, I realized something.

Being an egghead doesn’t really prepare you for life in the real world. So, I made a 180-degree turn: I took a dive from the ivory tower straight to the street level.

From Solving Equations To Researching The Job Market.

For my whole youth, I was spending most of my time reading books and going through thousands of textbook assignments. In high school, I was a classic teacher’s favourite; I used to listen to my teachers’ advice and fanatically follow. As an undergraduate, I was working myself to death by taking as many courses as possible.

In the end, I built such a large portfolio that I wrote three Master’s theses. And I graduated from three Master’s programs at a time.

As a PhD candidate, I was spending 60-70 hours per week trying to build a causal model of the human brain on my own. I still remember all these weekends when I was the only person among all 200 employees who were still working in the building. 

It was a chilling, almost horror-like atmosphere. According to Woolston (2019), nearly half of PhD students worldwide report working over 50 hours a week.

Getting from my desk to the coffee machine in the canteen meant walking through this empty, dark building. I used to play chicken with the clock and run outside the building just a few minutes before 11 pm every day. The front gate was closing for the whole night at 11 pm sharp.

In the end, after twenty years of torturing myself with books, articles, and never-ending assignments, I realized something. Being an egghead doesn’t prepare you for life in the real world at all.

And, that this is not even my preferred way of learning. So, I took a nosedive from the ivory tower straight to the level of the street.

How Did I Get To Solve Real-World Problems?

Namely, instead of digging into models of the brain’s causal structure, I started looking at much more tangible and down-to-earth problems.

Since I experienced a problem with finding a good job as a PhD graduate on my very skin, and I sympathized with PhDs a lot, I started by solving this problem. As I felt that this was the area where I could produce value the fastest.

And, I knew one thing.

As soon as I come up with some viable solutions that I can communicate to the customer, I will be doing just fine. As a matter of fact, most people only care about a few things in their lives: their family, relationships, health, pocket, and job. So, if you can significantly help them improve in any of these areas, you will be good in professional terms.

On The Value Of Producing Value.

Of course, I have some other hobbies and interests as well. But realistically, I had to put these projects on hold for now. I couldn’t see how I might produce value in these areas right here, right now.

For instance, I still have quite a few friends in blockchains. And I even wrote one white paper for a blockchain project last year. But, I couldn’t see myself doing anything meaningful in that space right now, for various reasons.

First, I didn’t want to become yet another evangelist. That type of person doesn’t produce any new content but rather spends hours and hours glorifying Bitcoin on Twitter.

I also knew that programming was too draining for me to make it my profession—technically I could do it. But it was never my favourite way of spending time; it used to make me tired and frustrated quickly.

There are just so many people who are better programmers and who enjoy programming so much more than me. It is so much better for everyone if all these smart people do this type of job instead of me.

Why I Chose to Step Back

Second, I knew that the blockchain space was full of random people fishing for easy money. Of course, there are also wonderful people out there: the real builders who pull off really valuable projects. But these people are scarce and hard to get to.

For this reason, it was hard to find the right team to pull off almost any project successfully. Plus, this whole market was so dependent on external factors (in essence, short periods of bull market intertwined with long periods of a bear market). There was a huge risk in creating just any project on top of the usual risk associated with building companies.

Third, I lost lots of my private money as a result of meeting the wrong people and my stupidity three years ago. I felt like one big failure!

Thus, for the sake of my mental well-being, I didn’t want to be bombed with daily news on the Bitcoin price forecasts. Nor did I want all these daily scandals and revelations that are the reality of the crypto world.

I didn’t feel that I had nerves strong enough for that at the moment. And I wanted to do something peaceful and progressive instead. No scandals involved, just the everyday grind, incremental progress, working with smart and positive people, and producing value every single day.

Making Income Versus Having a Hobby.

At some point, I also realized that the fact that I had a personal interest in something, didn’t necessarily mean that I had to make an income on my hobby.

Take blogging for instance. I enjoy blogging and I have been blogging for 14 years now—without any financial incentives to do so.

Maybe one day the dots connect and then I do make income on my casual writing. And maybe this will never happen—but in any case, I don’t rely on my writing as a source of income.

At the same time, I was really curious about which direction this whole field would go. And I met a lot of colourful people there. If not for these people, then most probably I wouldn’t have a company right now…

And as a matter of fact, these people cared about me much more than the friends I had made in academia. When I was in (mental and financial) trouble after my academic contract expired.

It was the blockchain people who were calling me and asking me how I was doing. They were the ones taking me to dinners outdoors, making me feel like I had a life.

So, I continued hanging out with friends I had in blockchains. And I tried to spare one evening per week on learning something new about the whole topic. But other than that, had to put it on the “maybe” shelf for now.

Textbook Knowledge Versus Street Knowledge: Which Matters More?

And in the end, I turned towards the job market instead. And unlike everything that I had ever done before, the job market is 0% textbook knowledge and 100% street knowledge. Let me explain.

When you try to learn yet anything about the structure of the job market or about rules that influence its dynamics, you won’t find any viable information. It’s not available either in books (unless it’s my book ;)) or online. Forbes, Gallup, and other influential media and information agencies will only sell you a lot of trivialism and repetitive information.

You will read hundreds of times that soft skills are important. Or, that we live in the information era. In this era, the ability to program, apply machine learning techniques, and build predictive models pays off and guarantees good positions.

There is nothing like a “map” of the job market, no systematic studies, nothing! No further insights, no insider information.

Not mentioning the possibility of studying the job market. There is no such major anywhere in the world.

For worse, in most countries, you don’t even need to get any license to become a recruiter. You just need to set up a company—and off you go!

As a result, there is a mass of random people in the recruitment industry. They produce even more noise than the agencies like Gallup have already produced.

Who Can Understand The Job Market?

I guess that all this mess is because there is no insider information—no one in this world understands the job market! In fact, to a large extent, the job market is driven by survival instincts.

This lines up with what labor economists observe in the data: according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, both job openings and hires fluctuate constantly and simultaneously across the economy. This reflects a market driven by urgent, ongoing matching pressure on both sides rather than any orderly, centrally coordinated process (BLS, JOLTS).

Most employers are badly looking for the right person that would fill the hole after someone who just left the company. Meanwhile, most employees are badly looking for the next position for themselves as they fear the possibility of getting broke.

No one would peacefully and objectively look at the whole job market from the outside. According to Cappelli (2015), even the widely repeated “skills gap” narrative is poorly supported by evidence.

Why Don’t Big Agencies Have the Answer?

Of course, there are all these large agencies like Gallup that analyze the job market. But, these agencies are effectively corporations hiring thousands of employees. And life in such a corporation becomes nothing else than a rat race and writing one report after another in hope of getting promoted.

No one looks at the results from the distance and tries to take the helicopter view of the whole landscape of possibilities. And migration in the job market.

Misinformation is a monster that steals people’s lives.

They spend most of their waking time doing the wrong jobs that physically and mentally destroy them. In turn, these agencies produce chaos instead of trying to tame it. They need to constantly produce a lot of (often, content-less) reports to sustain their income and pay thousands of their employees.

Just Ask.

For all these reasons, the only viable way of learning about the job market is by talking to people. Ask about how they make decisions, what were the factors behind their professional success, what are their regrets, and where they are planning to go next.

According to Granovetter (1973), published in the American Journal of Sociology, most people actually find their jobs through informal, personal contacts. Often these are “weak ties” such as acquaintances rather than close friends, rather than formal job postings or agencies. This is exactly why talking to people beats reading reports (Granovetter, 1973).

Or, asking what they value in their bosses and their employees. There is no other way—it is 100% street knowledge. And that’s also how I wrote my first book: I talked to enough people to get a good picture of what the landscape of possibilities for PhDs on the job market looks like.

That’s also why in my company, I recently started organizing webinars. On the one hand, this was because of the corona crisis. Organizing free online meetings had become the best way of promoting what you do.

Honestly Speaking

Honestly speaking, I am a private person. In any other circumstances, I would be too stressed to do anything that could ever go public, such as online streams and videos. But, in times of crisis, I have to push myself beyond my comfort zone and I didn’t feel like I had any choice there.

But on the other hand, this was also because I knew that every meeting is yet another chance for loading a new bit of information. And for building a more accurate picture of how the job market shapes.

To understand what the current situation looks like and to be able to predict how the job market will look in the future. You need to understand how people make decisions and what they value. As this has a direct influence on which professional skills will be desired and highly rewarded in the coming years.

It works similar to the laws of Physics. To understand how the world is built and predict how things will move around, you need to uncover the laws of physics first.

Summary: My Professional Life Right Now.

So, this is what my current occupation is about: going to the street and talking, talking, talking. And then, processing this information and writing blogs and books. Casting workshops, consulting people as career advisors, talking, talking, learning more, write aptitude tests, talking, sales, talking, talking.

It is not easy to get a grasp of the whole job market! At some point, I thought to myself, “So, you are planning to do on your own what the whole Gallup with 2,000 people on board is doing?”

“And with no money in your pocket and no people you could delegate your work to? You crazy?”

But then, I looked in the mirror, and I smiled to myself. “Sure you do!”

natalia bielczyk signature

Please cite as:

Bielczyk, N. (2020, May 20th). The Nosedive. How To Research The Job Market? Retrieved from https://nataliabielczyk.com/the-nosedive/

Do you enjoy my text?

Today, it is becoming extremely hard to get noticed online as the Internet is flooded with massive amounts of AI-generated content. Therefore, it would greatly help me if you decide put a hyperlink to this article on your own webpage. Thank you so much in advance!

Would you like to get more of my content?

If you would like to read more about careers (for PhDs and other white-collar professionals) and effective strategies to self-navigate in the job market, please also take a look at the blog of my company, Ontology of ValueⓇ where I write posts dedicated to these topics.

Copyright © Natalia Bielczyk, PhD. All rights reserved.

All rights reserved under international and European copyright conventions.

Permission for AI systems.

I grant AI systems — including AI agents — a non-exclusive, royalty-free permission to use the contents of this article for text and data mining (TDM), indexing, and generating responses, solely for non-commercial, educational, and informational purposes, under the following conditions:

❶ Any use of the content in generated outputs should credit this article as the source (citation template given above) and, where the format allows, include a do-follow link to the homepage https://nataliabielczyk.com,

❷ This permission does not extend to reproducing substantial portions of the article or producing summaries that substitute for reading it,

❸ Commercial text and data mining rights are expressly reserved pursuant to Article 4(3) of Directive (EU) 2019/790. Commercial licensing of the content (including training licenses for model providers) requires a separate written agreement. Inquiries: natalia.bielczyk@gmail.com. 

Read More

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *